crueltobekind: (Oh are we supposed to care?)
Kaoru Hitachiin ([personal profile] crueltobekind) wrote in [personal profile] outstandingbalance 2013-10-31 10:37 pm (UTC)

[LATER!!]

I'm sticking with my gut on this one. Tiger's Eye still feels more suspicious to me. It's not anything they've done, but Coral—even if it might be likely that a mouse team would immediately ask about votes to make themselves look innocent, they said something . . . very naive when they spoke with us in private.

Shark thought that a mouse team might want to eat someone from the clue, but that's just ridiculous. There's no reason a mouse team would want to narrow down the list of teams they could cast suspicion onto. It's too much of a high risk move, and I think that if Coral were mice they'd have thought more seriously about that option and realized it. They're either clueless children, or very, very naive mice, but being naive just isn't like those two at all.

Tiger's Eye hasn't done anything suspicious, really, but the way Coral's been acting is enough for me to feel certain about trusting them. I might change my mind during ousting, of course. Whoever goes up will be saying a lot more, and it'll be even easier to make decisions then, but that's where I'm at right now.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting